Check this site for any updated news or articles
~ ~ ~ Updated News~ ~ ~
The third annual MDABE Spring Conference is scheduled for Saturday April 21, 2007. More detailed information and a registration form after January 1, 2007. Thank you for your patience, Best wishes, MDABE Conference team
*****************
The following are some interesting articles
**** Published: January 4, 2006
Arizona Gets Ultimatum on Aid for English-Learners By Mary Ann Zehr
Arizona
legislators and Gov. Janet Napolitano have their work cut out for them
in this new year: to come up with a plan to provide more money for
teaching English-language learners, or face fines of up to $2 million a
day.
In a ruling last month, a federal court gave the state
until Jan. 24, or just 15 days following the start of its 2006
legislative session, to find a way to adequately fund programs for such
students, or be fined $500,000 per day for 30 days. The daily fine
would increase to a maximum of $2 million if the state continued to
miss the court's deadlines.
Ms. Napolitano, a Democrat,
immediately invited lawmakers to work with her on a resolution. One
lawmaker suggested that the process should begin with legislation on
the issue that the governor vetoed last year.
The Dec. 15 ruling
by U.S. District Judge Raner C. Collins is the latest in the Flores v.
Arizona school finance lawsuit, which was filed in 1992. Six years ago,
the U.S. District Court, based in Phoenix, ruled that the state did not
spend enough for the education of English-language learners.
In
the latest decision, the court added that students who are still
learning English do not have to pass Arizona's high school exam to
receive a diploma until the state proves it has fixed the funding
problem.
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne
said in an interview that he would ask the Arizona attorney general to
file an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
He and others pledged to work together to craft a solution to satisfy the court ruling while at the same time opposing it.
"It's
inappropriate and unconstitutional for a federal judge to be telling a
state that we're going to be paying fines to the federal government
because we haven't solved the problem the way he wants it to be
solved," said Sen. Ken Bennett, a Republican and the president of the
state Senate. "Much of the reason Arizona has to educate so many
[English-language learners] is that the federal government hasn't done
its job securing borders."
In February 2000, the court ruled
that the state's method of funding programs for English-language
learners was inadequate and violated the Equal Educational Opportunity
Act of 1974, which requires school districts to take actions to
overcome students' language barriers in educational programs.
'Effective
Sanctions' Mr. Bennett said legislators would try to improve the same
bill that they passed last spring that attempted to address funding for
the education of the state's 160,000 English-language learners.
By
passing that bill, the legislature had hoped to satisfy a previous
court mandate that it fix the funding problem for English-language
learners by April of last year or the end of the legislative session,
whichever came later. But Gov. Napolitano vetoed the bill in May,
saying it didn't provide enough money for English-language learners.
Court
Pressure A federal court has given the Arizona legislature until Jan.
24, or 15 days after the start of the 2006 legislative session, to
adequately fund education programs for English-language learners.
Jan.
9, 2006, Beginning of 2006 legislative session. Grace period of 15
calendar days. Jan. 24 A $500,000-per-day fine for the next 30 days
will be imposed until the state is in compliance. Feb. 23. If the state
has still not complied, the court will impose a fine of $1 million per
day for the following 30 days until the state is in compliance. March
25 If the state continues to be out of compliance, the court will
impose a fine of $1.5 million per day until the end of the 2006
legislative session. End of 2006 legislative session. If the state
has not complied by the end of the session, a fine of $2 million per
day will be imposed until the state has complied with the Jan. 28,
2005, court order.
SOURCE: U.S. District Court for the
District of ArizonaPatti Urias, a spokeswoman for the governor, said
that the December ruling has "some teeth" to it. "When you talk about
fining the state money, that's pressure," she said in an interview. She
added that the governor has invited the legislative leadership to visit
her office to work out a solution.
Mr. Horne, the state schools
chief, contended that the federal court has unfairly failed to take
into consideration the amount of funding that the state receives from
the federal government for English-language learners in determining
that funding overall in Arizona for such students is inadequate. At the
least, he said, the court should take federal funds into account and
tell Arizona the amount that it needs to make up.
Mr. Horne also
disputed the court's decision to exempt English-language learners from
the high school exit exam until the funding matter is resolved.
The exam is part of Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards, or AIMS, the state testing system.
"Until
this ruling, these students were heavily motivated to become proficient
in English. This ruling undercuts their motivation to acquire the
skills they need to succeed in today's economy," Mr. Horne said.
Timothy
M. Hogan, the public-interest lawyer who filed the Flores v. Arizona
lawsuit, said he was pleased with the court's decision. "We got some
pretty effective sanctions in place," he said, referring to the
potential fines. "If [legislators] have a 100-day session and don't do
anything, the total would be $72.5 million."
Immigration Impact The day before the federal court issued last month's ruling, Superintendent
Horne issued a press release saying that he had asked Arizona's U.S.
congressional delegation to request $750 million in federal aid to help
pay Arizona for what it costs to educate children who do not have
documentation of legal U.S. residence.
"I would urge the Arizona
delegation to push for an allocation of federal dollars to defray the
costs to state taxpayers, who are currently bearing the burden of
paying for the education of children who are not here legally," Mr.
Horne said in the Dec. 14 statement. Mr. Horne, citing what he said
were figures from the Pew Hispanic Center, said that Arizona has
125,000 undocumented children in its schools.
Jeffrey S. Passel,
a senior research associate for the Pew Hispanic Center, a research
center based in Washington, said in response that while he had once
stated that Arizona had 125,000 children of undocumented immigrants, a
majority of those children were born in the United States and thus are
American citizens. He estimates that Arizona actually has about 60,000
children who are living in the country illegally.
Mr. Horne said that Arizona shouldn't have to bear most of the burden of educating
either the children who are undocumented themselves or those who were
born in the United States and are the children of immigrants who reside
in the United States illegally. Zoe Ann Brown *** Publisher: Multilingual Matters http://www.multilingual-matters.com/Journal Title: International Journal of Bilingual Education & BilingualismVolume Number: 8, Issue Number: 2&3, Issue Date: 2005Subtitle: Heritage/Community Language Education: US and AustralianPerspectivesMain Text:Nancy H. Hornberger: Introduction Heritage/Community Language Education: US and Australian PerspectivesBiliterate Content of HCLE: Community and IdentityHelen Borland: Heritage Languages and Community Identity Building: The Caseof a Language of Lesser StatusAnne Pauwels: Maintaining the Community Language in Australia: Challenges and Roles for FamiliesContexts for Biliteracy in HCLE: Policy and EcologyRichard B. Baldauf Jr.: Coordinating Government and Community Support forCommunity Language Teaching in Australia: Overview with Special Attentionto New South WalesAntonio Mercurio and Angela Scarino: Heritage Languages at Upper SecondaryLevel in South Australia: A Struggle for LegitimacyChristine Nicholls: Death by a Thousand Cuts: Indigenous Language BilingualEducation Programmes in the Northern Territory of Australia, 1972-1998Biliterate Media for HCLE: Programme Goals and CurriculaMichèle de Courcy: Policy Challenges for Bilingual and Immersion Education inAustralia: Literacy and Language Choices for Users of Aboriginal Languages,Auslan and ItalianG. Richard Tucker: Innovative Language Education Programmes for Heritage Language Students: The Special Case of Puerto RicansBiliteracy Development in HCLE: Assessment and ProficiencyCatherine Elder: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Heritage Language Education: What Role for Testing?Olga Kagan: In Support of a Proficiency-based Definition of HeritageLanguage Learners: The Case of RussianCommentaryTerrence G. Wiley: Discontinuities in Heritage and CommunityLanguage Education: Challenges for Educational Language PoliciesBook ReviewsLinguistic Field(s): English SociolinguisticsSubject Language(s): Dutch (DUT) German, Standard (GER)*********************Publisher: Cambridge University Press http://us.cambridge.orgJournal Title: Bilingualism: Language and CognitionVolume Number: 8Issue Number: 1Issue Date: April 2005Main Text:Codeswitching and generative grammar: A critique of the MLF model and someremarks on "modified minimalism"Jeff MacswanBare forms and lexical insertions in code-switching: A processing-based accountJonathan OwensL2 vs. L3 initial state: A comparative study of the acquisition of FrenchDPs byVietnamese monolinguals and Cantonese-English bilingualsYan-kit ingrid LeungWhat is so difficult about telicity marking in L2 Russian?Roumyana SlabakovaHow iconic are Chinese characters?Gigi Luk, Ellen BialystokAsymmetrical language switching costs in Chinese-English bilinguals' numbernaming and simple arithmeticJamie i. d. CampbellEditorial tribute to Elizabeth BatesPing LiLinguistic Field(s): Language AcquisitionSociolinguisticsSyntaxWriting SystemsCognitive ScienceSubject Language(s): Chinese, Mandarin (CHN)French (FRN)Russian (RUS)Vietnamese (VIE)Chinese, Yue (YUH)****************Publisher: Cambridge University Presshttp://us.cambridge.org Journal Title: Studies in Second Language AcquisitionVolume Number: 27Issue Number: 1Issue Date: March 2005Main Text:ATTENTION WHEN?: An Investigation of the Ordering Effect of Input andInteractionSusan Gass, María josé alvarez TorresPARAMETER SETTING IN LANGUAGE ACQUISITIONSilvina MontrulROMANCE SYNTAX, SEMANTICS, AND L2 ACQUISITIONSilvina MontrulCOMPUTER LEARNER CORPORA, SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, AND FOREIGNLANGUAGE TEACHINGLawrence j. ZwierTEACHING ACADEMIC ESL WRITING: PRACTICAL TECHNIQUES IN VOCABULARYAND GRAMMARAlissa CohenWORKING WITH DISCOURSE: MEANING BEYOND THE CLAUSELynda YatesOPTIMALITY THEORY IN PHONOLOGY: A READERYen-hwei LinLITERACY AND THE SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERMargot HaynesBILINGUALISM: BEYOND BASIC PRINCIPLESJasone CenozPRAGMATIC DEVELOPMENT IN A SECOND LANGUAGESusan BurtINVISIBLE WORK: BILINGUALISM, LANGUAGE CHOICE, AND CHILDREARING ININTERMARRIED FAMILIESRobert BayleyPUBLICATIONS RECEIVEDKim McdonoughRECEPTIVE AND PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY LEARNING: The Effects ofReading and Writing on Word KnowledgeStuart WebbGAPS IN SECOND LANGUAGE SENTENCE PROCESSINGHarald Clahsen, Claudia Felser, Theodore Marinis, Leah RobertsIDENTIFYING THE IMPACT OF NEGATIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNERS' RESPONSES ON ESLQUESTION DEVELOPMENTKim McdonoughLinguistic Field(s): Language AcquisitionPhonologySociolinguisticsSyntaxApplied Linguistics*********************Publisher: Cambridge University Presshttp://us.cambridge.orgJournal Title: Language in SocietyVolume Number: 31Issue Number: 5Issue Date: November 2002Main Text:Regulatory comments as tools of family socialization: A comparison of Estonian,Swedish and Finnish mealtime interactionTiia Tulviste, Luule Mizera, Boel De geer, Marja-terttu Tryggvason"I'm Mommy and you're Natalie": Role-reversal and embedded frames inmother-child discourseCynthia GordonGrowing up monolingual in a bilingual community: The Quichua revitalizationparadoxCamilla Rindstedt, Karin AronssonDialect accommodation in a bi-ethnic mountain enclave community: More evidenceon the development of African American EnglishChristine Mallinson, Walt WolframREVIEWSAlessandro Duranti, ed., Key terms in language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell,2001. Pp. v, 282.Chantal TetreaultPatrizia Violi, Meaning and experience.Translated by Jeremy Carden. (Advances in Semiotics, Thomas A. Sebeok, generaled.). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2001. Pp. xiv,291. Hb $49.95.Robert e. MaclauryAlison Sealy, Childly language: Children, language and the social world.London:Longman, Pearson Education, 2000. Pp. 229.Lourdes De leónDiane Belcher and Ulla Connor, eds., Reflections on multiliterate lives.(Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, Vol. 26, Series editors Colin Baker &Nancy Hornberger.) Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, 2001. Pp. vii, 211.Hb $79.95, pb $29.95.Elizabeth ScheyderDennis Ager, Motivation in language planning and language policy. Clevedon,England: Multilingual Matters, 2001. Pp. vi, 210. Pb. $24.95.Christina bratt PaulstonStephen Barbour and Cathie Carmichael, eds., Language and nationalism inEurope.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. 319. Hb, $70.00.Joan a. ArgenterTessa Carroll, Language planning and language change in Japan. Richmond,Surrey:Curzon Press, 2001. Pp. 275. Hb. $40.00Patricia j. WetzelHiroko Tanaka, Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: A study in grammar andinteraction. (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, 56.) Philadelphia: JohnBenjamins, 1999. Pp. xiv, 242. Hb $87.00.Shoko IkutaRob Amery, 'Warrabarna Kaurna!' Reclaiming an Australian language.(Multilingualism and Linguistic Diversity 1). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets &Zeitlinger, 2000. Pp. xx, 289. Hb $63.00.Christopher LoetherMimi Nichter, Fat talk: What girls and their parents say about dieting.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000. Pp. xi, 263. Hb $22.95.Mary BucholtzLinguistic Field(s): Language DescriptionSociolinguisticsLanguage AcquisitionSubject Language(s): English (ENG)Estonian (EST)Finnish (FIN)Quichua, Highland, Imbabura (QHO)Swedish (SWD)*************************Curriculum and Instruction Special Education Lecturer
The Division of Curriculum and Instruction at Arizona State University is seeking a full-time lecturer to work in the College of Education's Special Education Program. Responsibilities include teaching undergraduate/graduate courses within the special education program, coordination of field based courses, supporting preservice teachers in internship/student teaching settings, and collaborating with educators at the university and field sites. This position is a three-year appointment, annually renewable beginning from August 16, 2005.
Qualifications: Required Earned masters in special education or related field; demonstrated experience teaching adults in school/college settings; and experience in special education.
Desired Earned doctorate degree in special education or related field; experience teaching Pre-K-12 special education classrooms, experience collaborating with schools and districts in preservice teacher education, demonstrated knowledge of one or more content areas, experience in working with children in diverse multicultural/multilingual settings, demonstrated knowledge of Arizona Education Standards, and experience in distance education.
Application Deadline April 26, 2005, 5:00 p.m., if not filled, every week thereafter until search is closed.
Application Procedure Candidates must send a letter of application which must include a one-page personal statement outlining their qualifications for the position, a current and complete vita, names/phone numbers of three (3) references who can address teaching effectiveness, knowledge and expertise in the field and other relevant information.
All applications must be sent to Special Education Lecturer Search, Arizona State University, College of Education, Curriculum and Instruction, P.O. Box 871011, Tempe, AZ 85287-1011.
Arizona State University is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer.
#8259 ********Subject: Technicality fails official EnglishTechnicality fails official English THE ASSOCIATED PRESS April 17, 2005 http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/news/70742.php CHARLESTON,
W.Va. - West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin vetoed a bill Saturday that
would have made English the state's official language - not because he
didn't like the idea, but because the legislation had a technical flaw.
Manchin, who had co-sponsored unsuccessful English-only bills when
he was a lawmaker, cited the state constitution, which limits each
piece of legislation to one topic. The original bill, on increasing the
size of local park and recreation boards, was amended during the final
hours of the regular legislative session. Efforts to make English the
state's official language have been introduced annually since the late
1990s. Twenty-seven other states have adopted English as their official
language. *********Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:07:42 +0000Subject: vote in English as official languageLawmakers unwittingly vote in English as official language Associated Press Apr. 12, 2005 http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0412OfficialEnglish12-ON.html CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Two days after the end of the legislative session, state lawmakers are discovering something few were aware of: They voted to make English the official language of West Virginia.
The
language amendment was quietly inserted into a bill addressing the
number of members that cities can appoint to boards of parks and
recreation. Among mundane details about record-keeping, the amendment
adds the provision that "English shall be the official language of the
State of West Virginia."
Senate Majority Whip Billy Wayne Bailey
successfully offered that change to House Bill 2782 amid a flurry of
bills moving back and forth between the House and Senate on Saturday,
the last night of the 60-day legislative session. "I just told the members that the amendment clarifies the way in which documents are produced," Bailey, a Democrat, said Monday.
House
Majority Leader Rick Staton recommended that his chamber agree with the
Senate's changes. But Staton, also a Democrat, said he was unaware of
the substance of the amendment until asked about it by The Associated
Press Monday evening.
Efforts
to make English the state's official language have been introduced
annually since the late 1990s. A group called U.S. English has
championed the cause.
"I
think it's wrong that's something like that was snuck into that bill in
the last minute," said House Judiciary Chairman Jon Amores, who helped
kill an earlier proposal to forbid any state or local agency from
having to print documents in any language but English.
A spokeswoman for Gov. Joe Manchin could not immediately be reached for comment.
Andrew
Schneider, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of
West Virginia, said English-only laws are based on the false premise
that immigrants will not learn English without government coercion.
"And
English-only laws do nothing constructive to increase English
proficiency. They simply discriminate and punish those who have not yet
learned English," Schneider said.
|